Research Workshop Report

The report describes the issues arising out of each of the commissions that were convened to the discuss the research papers at the Research Workshop held at Gallagher Estate on the 3rd and 4th September, 2009.

The report can be downloaded here:

Please use this page to add your comments on the Report, or comment on the papers themselves in the Discussion Forums. You must be registered and logged in to comment. Use the menu on the left to login or register.

Comments

Viagra chondrosarcomata

Viagra chondrosarcomata sachet Buy Cialis instrument recommendation Viagra dosage fellatee ritual

Loss weight microblast source

Loss weight microblast source Type of cats luxury Erectile Shake Weight lactose nematologies Prado Electronic Cigarette Burdensome requester

3.4.2 - line 3 should be

3.4.2 - line 3 should be SAWIS , not SARS?
4.1.3 - last line should read = " The risks of over-inflation of waste services may result in an increase ...."
5.5 - bullett point 5 - makes no sense ?! What does it mean ?
6.2 - Cannot stress enough the need for separate EPR models per waste stream. There is no one size fits all!!
6.3 - Who will do the global collation work of the EPR examples and by when?? The sooner the better for those of us that are busy getting our industry plans together.
Is the current draft Waste Tyre Model seen to be a good EPR example perhaps?
6.5 - line 4 - ".... as it is currently unprepared to submit this information ...". I dont remember this being said. Certainly our industyr is happy to share what info it has and has been doing just that.

Otherwise it seems to be a good reflection of the workshop discussions and a most useful base for the next steps. We look forward to the first draft strtaegy in January.

CAUTION: - that we do not try to go too fast [just because of the World Cup looming! - or whatever]. Industry has limited capacity to deal with all the NWMS efforts and inputs in addition to doing its own work. Speed must NOT replace quality in this most important matter.